Writers of the Future 32 On Sale

Twitter WOTF Amazon 99c eBook card1If you don’t read my newsletter (you should subscribe!), you might not know that Writers of the Future 32, containing my story “The Star Tree,” is on sale for 99 cents at Amazon.comKobo, and Nook. (I understand it’s also supposed to be on sale via Apple’s iTunes, but the link wasn’t working for me when I tried it.)

The anthology is currently the number-one best seller in Amazon’s science fiction anthologies category, as well as in the post-apocalyptic category. (Stewart C. Baker’s  “Images Across a Shattered Sea” is an excellent post-apocalyptic story in the volume.)

If you’ve been on the fence about buying the book, 99 cents for the digital edition is a steal for so many great stories.

I’m back… and upcoming appearances


Artwork by S. Qiouyi Lu. Used with Permission.

I’ve returned from Clarion West, and my mind and heart are still blown. I’ve come back with a new group of friends, a head full of crazy ideas, and a new tattoo.

My estimable classmate S. Qiouyi Lu (who also did our fabulous Team Arsenic drawing) has written a fabulous blog post on Clarion West 2016 lessons that’s more cogent than anything I could manage right now. Perhaps I’ll have my own additions at a later date.

You probably haven’t noticed that my Appearances page has been updated. I’ll be attending MidAmeriCon as a fan later this month, just for Friday through Sunday. Towards the end of September, I’ll be a featured reader at Two Hour Transport and attending the launch of the Untethered magic iPhone anthology.

I hope to see many of you there!

Reading at University Book Store

Tomorrow, Thursday, June 30th, at 7 pm, Stephen Merlino and I will be reading from Writers of the Future, Volume 32, at the University Book Store. We will be joined by WOTF32 artist Paul Otteni.


You’re probably sick of this picture by now.

It would be impossible to overstate how excited I am about this reading. The University Book Store hosts the Clarion West summer reading series, and Duane Wilkins, who runs the SF readings there, has been called “Seattle’s godfather of sci-fi and fantasy.” I love the readings that they host, and it’s my dream location for a reading.

Please come join us.

Gone Fishin’

For the next six weeks, I’ll be attending the Clarion West writer’s workshop, a six week program designed to improve my writing and prepare me for a career as a professional author.


During the workshop, I don’t plan to update this blog, unless I’m especially inspired to do so. (I will have one automated post reminding people to attend my reading at the University Book Store on Thursday, June 30th.)

In the meantime, I’d encourage you to support the Clarion West Write-a-thon. If you’re a writer, you can sign up to participate. If you’re a reader, you can sponsor a participating writer. Either way, you’re helping to fund good people who train writers to succeed.

Robinson’s Mars Trilogy: A Harbinger of Difficult SF

71bINMUVSPLAfter Matt Dovey asked me whether The Martian was Difficult SF, our mutual friend (and, to my knowledge, nobody’s nemesis) Stewart C Baker asked me about Kim Stanley Robinson‘s Mars trilogy:

Kim Stanley Robinson’s Red Mars trilogy might be a more Difficult SF read than The Martian (although I haven’t read the latter).

It has a huge, sprawling cast which recognizes that people exist outside the USA (although said cast, to be fair, largely splits over Cold War era space stuff, with Russia and the US still playing a disproportionate role which seems dated today).  Red Mars and its sequels also strike me, at least, as “emotionally plausible” with a satisfying ending, and Robinson is never afraid to pull out all the literary stops.

I have to admit: it’s been nearly twenty years since I read the trilogy, but I recall that the mission devolves in part based on deeply held personal beliefs without a clear right or wrong, lending weight to its emotional plausibility; the characters never feel like cardboard cutouts; and Robinson cares a good deal about his language at a literary level. The panoramic Martian landscapes are way more fully realized than in The Martian. (Which, again, I loved and I’m not criticizing here!)

So, yeah, the Mars trilogy points the way toward Difficult SF. Thanks for the excellent question, Stewart!

Why The Martian isn’t Difficult SF.

41DNuJfahyLRecently Matt Dovey, my friend and sometime nemesis wanted me to boil my rather waffly non-manifesto down into something a little more concrete.

I suggested that if Difficult SF had rules, they were to be realistic in depicting people and relationships, and concerned with good (not necessarily showy) writing.

Then Matt asked:

Is The Martian Difficult SF? It’s certainly rigorous, to the point that Andy Weir wrote software to plan launch schedules to work out when he had to set it to allow them to take potatoes for Thanksgiving (and then ran a competition based on who could work it out). It’s cognizant of the realities of the world—the Chinese space agency plays an important role, and the cast at NASA is diverse. But Mark Watney is inhumanly cheerful and resilient, and deliberately so—Weir didn’t want the novel to be about a man breaking down on Mars, but a man surviving and escaping. That’s fine as an artistic choice, and it made for a very entertaining book and film, but it isn’t “emotionally plausible.”

Great question. I loved the book. I loved its protagonist Mark Watney’s voice, and I inhaled it more quickly than any other book I read between Joe Hill’s NOS4A2 and Liz Hand’s Hard Light. (Quick test: am I reading the book while brushing my teeth? If so, I can’t put it down.) Moreover, I think it did just about everything that Andy Weir wanted it to do. To my mind, The Martian was thus artistically successful, and commercially successful too—but was it Difficult?

Matt was right: Mark Watney is inhumanly resilient and cheerful, and that’s a valid artistic choice, but not a Difficult one.

I did like the Earth politics, but I’m not sure they went far enough to be Difficult: the “just let him die” contingent seems to knuckle under quite easily, nobody’s leaking to the media to undercut other interest groups, the US President doesn’t put the kibosh on the Chinese involvement even though it makes the US look weak, and so on. But more than that, none of the Earth characters seem to have rich emotional lives—they’re described entirely in terms of their roles and functions. It’s absolutely a valid artistic choice, and one that made the book more of what it wanted to be, but it wasn’t a Difficult choice.

Also, Andy Weir’s writing seems to me to be functional rather than beautiful. And I don’t think he intended it to be literary in tone, so that’s not a criticism either.

The Martian is a great read, and a book I frequently recommend, but it’s not Difficult SF and it doesn’t want to be.

(Thanks to Matt for letting me break the Cone of Silence and use his questions for my blog.)

[2016-05-13: I’ve added a followup post here.]